Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 4 authors, 2014-07-28

Re: [PATCH v3] Use the POWER8 Micro Partition Prefetch Engine in KVM HV on POWER8

From: Stewart Smith <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-18 04:10:23

Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:19:57PM +1000, Stewart Smith wrote:
quoted
The POWER8 processor has a Micro Partition Prefetch Engine, which is
a fancy way of saying "has way to store and load contents of L2 or
L2+MRU way of L3 cache". We initiate the storing of the log (list of
addresses) using the logmpp instruction and start restore by writing
to a SPR.

The logmpp instruction takes parameters in a single 64bit register:
- starting address of the table to store log of L2/L2+L3 cache contents
  - 32kb for L2
  - 128kb for L2+L3
  - Aligned relative to maximum size of the table (32kb or 128kb)
- Log control (no-op, L2 only, L2 and L3, abort logout)

We should abort any ongoing logging before initiating one.
Do we ever want to wait for ongoing logging to finish?
*Probably* not... but as far as I can see the hardware doesn't expose a
way to find out if there is any ongoing logging or a way to be notified
when it's done.
quoted
+#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES)
+#define MPP_BUFFER_ORDER	0
+#elif defined(CONFIG_PPC_4K_PAGES)
+#define MPP_BUFFER_ORDER	4
Why 4 not 3?  You only need 32kB, don't you?
Correct. whoops.
quoted
+static struct kvmppc_vcore *kvmppc_vcore_create(struct kvm *kvm, int core)
+{
+	struct kvmppc_vcore *vcore;
+
+	vcore = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvmppc_vcore), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	if (vcore == NULL)
+		return NULL;
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vcore->runnable_threads);
+	spin_lock_init(&vcore->lock);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&vcore->wq);
+	vcore->preempt_tb = TB_NIL;
+	vcore->lpcr = kvm->arch.lpcr;
+	vcore->first_vcpuid = core * threads_per_core;
+	vcore->kvm = kvm;
Is there a particular reason why you need to pull this code out into a
separate function?  If so, it would be a little nicer if you did that
in a separate patch, to make it easier to see that the code motion
changes nothing.
ack, done.
quoted
@@ -1590,9 +1645,16 @@ static void kvmppc_run_core(struct kvmppc_vcore *vc)
 
 	srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vc->kvm->srcu);
 
+	if (vc->mpp_buffer_is_valid)
+		ppc_start_restoring_l2_cache(vc);
+
 	__kvmppc_vcore_entry();
 
 	spin_lock(&vc->lock);
+
+	if (vc->mpp_buffer)
+		ppc_start_saving_l2_cache(vc);
I wonder if we would get better performance improvements if we kicked
this off earlier, for instance before we save all the FP/VSX state and
switch the MMU?  I guess that could be a subsequent patch.
Possibly, yes. Maybe something to look at in future patch, along with if
also doing the L3 save/restore is a benefit.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help