Thread (63 messages) flat view 63 messages, 6 authors, 2014-03-18

Re: [PATCH v3 00/52] CPU hotplug: Fix issues with callback registration

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-11 00:16:14
Also in: linux-arch, linux-pm, lkml

On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 02:03:52 AM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Many subsystems and drivers have the need to register CPU hotplug callbacks
from their init routines and also perform initialization for the CPUs that are
already online. But unfortunately there is no race-free way to achieve this
today.

For example, consider this piece of code:

	get_online_cpus();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

	put_online_cpus();

This is not safe because there is a possibility of an ABBA deadlock involving
the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock.

          CPU 0                                         CPU 1
          -----                                         -----

   Acquire cpu_hotplug.lock
   [via get_online_cpus()]

                                              CPU online/offline operation
                                              takes cpu_add_remove_lock
                                              [via cpu_maps_update_begin()]

   Try to acquire
   cpu_add_remove_lock
   [via register_cpu_notifier()]

                                              CPU online/offline operation
                                              tries to acquire cpu_hotplug.lock
                                              [via cpu_hotplug_begin()]

                            *** DEADLOCK! ***


Other combinations of callback registration also don't work correctly.
Examples:

	register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

	get_online_cpus();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	put_online_cpus();

This can lead to double initialization if a hotplug operation occurs after
registering the notifier and before invoking get_online_cpus().

On the other hand, the following piece of code can miss hotplug events
altogether:

	get_online_cpus();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	put_online_cpus();
              ^
              |   Race window; Can miss hotplug events here
              v
	register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);


To solve these issues and provide a race-free method to register CPU hotplug
callbacks, this patchset introduces new variants of the callback registration
APIs that don't hold the cpu_add_remove_lock, and exports the
cpu_add_remove_lock via 2 new APIs cpu_notifier_register_begin/done() for use
by various subsystems. With this in place, the following code snippet will
register a hotplug callback as well as initialize already online CPUs without
any race conditions.

	cpu_notifier_register_begin();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	/* This doesn't take the cpu_add_remove_lock */
	__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

	cpu_notifier_register_done();


In this patchset, patch 1 adds lockdep annotations to catch the above mentioned
deadlock scenario. Patch 2 introduces the new APIs and infrastructure necessary
for race-free callback registration. The remaining patches perform tree-wide
conversions (to use this model).

This patchset has been hosted in the below git tree. It applies cleanly on
v3.14-rc6.

git://github.com/srivatsabhat/linux.git cpuhp-registration-fixes-v3
So to me, this is a useful patchset and it addresses a real problem.  It has
gone through several rounds of review and recently I haven't really seen any
objections against is from anyone.  On the contrary, I've seen ACKs from a
number of people whom I trust.

Thus, if nobody objects, I'm going to take this series into the PM tree for 3.15.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help