Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the... | linuxppc-dev

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-01-24
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-24
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-01-24
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-01-24
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-24
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-01-25
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-01-25
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-01-25
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-01-27
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-01-28
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-01-29
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-01-29
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-01-30
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-03
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-04
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-04
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-04
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-05
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-05
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-01-27
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-06
[RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-06
[RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-07
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-07
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-07
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-07
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-07
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-10
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-10
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-11
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-10
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-11
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-12
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-13
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-17
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-02-19
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-20
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-24
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-24
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-03-13
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-13
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-17
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-02-18
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-19
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-02-19
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-02-08
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-10
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-07-22
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-07-22
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-07-22
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2014-07-22
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-07-22
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-07-23
[RFC PATCH 3/3] slub: fallback to get_numa_mem() node if we want to allocate on memoryless node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] slub: fallback to get_numa_mem() node if we want to allocate on memoryless node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] slub: fallback to get_numa_mem() node if we want to allocate on memoryless node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-07
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] slub: fallback to get_numa_mem() node if we want to allocate on memoryless node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-07
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] slub: fallback to get_numa_mem() node if we want to allocate on memoryless node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-02-10
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-02-06
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() · Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden> · 2014-05-16
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2014-05-19
Re: [RESEND PATCH] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id() · David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> · 2014-06-05
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-01-27
Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2014-01-27

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node

From: Joonsoo Kim <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-17 07:00:44
Also in: linux-mm

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:51:37PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

Hi Joonsoo,
Also, given that only ia64 and (hopefuly soon) ppc64 can set
CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES, does that mean x86_64 can't have
memoryless nodes present? Even with fakenuma? Just curious.

I don't know, because I'm not expert on NUMA system :)
At first glance, fakenuma can't be used for testing
CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES. Maybe some modification is needed.

Thanks.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help