Re: ppc: RECLAIM_DISTANCE 10?
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-19 16:59:55
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 19.02.2014 [08:24:38 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 18.02.2014 [17:43:38 -0800], David Rientjes wrote:quoted
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:quoted
How about the following?diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 5de4337..1a0eced 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c@@ -1854,7 +1854,8 @@ static void __paginginit init_zone_allows_reclaim(int nid) int i; for_each_online_node(i) - if (node_distance(nid, i) <= RECLAIM_DISTANCE) + if (node_distance(nid, i) <= RECLAIM_DISTANCE || + !NODE_DATA(i)->node_present_pages) node_set(i, NODE_DATA(nid)->reclaim_nodes); else zone_reclaim_mode = 1;[ I changed the above from NODE_DATA(nid) -> NODE_DATA(i) as you caught so we're looking at the right code. ] That can't be right, it would allow reclaiming from a memoryless node. I think what you want isGah, you're right.quoted
for_each_online_node(i) { if (!node_present_pages(i)) continue; if (node_distance(nid, i) <= RECLAIM_DISTANCE) { node_set(i, NODE_DATA(nid)->reclaim_nodes); continue; } /* Always try to reclaim locally */ zone_reclaim_mode = 1; } but we really should be able to do for_each_node_state(i, N_MEMORY) here and memoryless nodes should already be excluded from that mask.Yep, I found that afterwards, which simplifies the logic. I'll add this to my series :)
In looking at the code, I am wondering about the following:
init_zone_allows_reclaim() is called for each nid from
free_area_init_node(). Which means that calculate_node_totalpages for
other "later" nids and check_for_memory() [which sets up the N_MEMORY
nodemask] hasn't been called yet.
So, would it make sense to pull up the
/* Any memory on that node */
if (pgdat->node_present_pages)
node_set_state(nid, N_MEMORY);
check_for_memory(pgdat, nid);
into free_area_init_node()?
Thanks,
Nish