Thread (36 messages) flat view 36 messages, 8 authors, 2013-03-07

RE: [PATCH 1/6 v8] iommu/fsl: Store iommu domain information pointer in archdata.

From: Yoder Stuart-B08248 <hidden>
Date: 2013-03-01 16:22:06
Also in: linux-iommu, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy [mailto:aik@ozlabs.ru]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 4:07 AM
To: Sethi Varun-B16395
Cc: Kumar Gala; Benjamin Herrenschmidt; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org;=
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
list; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list; Wood Scott-B07421; Yoder Stuart-=
B08248; Joerg Roedel; Paul
Mackerras; David Gibson; Alex Williamson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 v8] iommu/fsl: Store iommu domain information poi=
nter in archdata.
=20
btw the device struct already has a pointer to its iommu_group, and the
iommu_group struct itself has a pointer void *iommu_data which you could
use for anything you want (iommu_group_get_iommudata(),
iommu_group_set_iommudata()).

By design you are expected to add iommu groups to a domain but not device=
s
so I am not so sure that you really need a pointer to domain in the devic=
e
struct.
Well, at the lowest level the IOMMU API does attach devices to domains-- i.=
e.
API attach_dev().  So, it seems to conceptually make sense to have a ptr
from the device to the associated domain.  When you implement attach_dev()
you need to be able to see whether the device is already attached to
a domain.   Adding a couple of levels of indirection...from device to
group to domain...doesn't seems to make things simpler or better IMHO.

x86 keeps a pointer to the domain in device archdata and since there is
a direct correlation between a device and domain I'd rather see it
where this patch has it.

Stuart
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help