Dear Florian Fainelli,

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:27:56 +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote:

It looks like I introduced two redundant mvmdio instances as ge01
refers to the ge00 smi bus (the same applies to ge11 and ge10).
Thanks for spotting this.

Ok, good.

If you take a closer look at mv643xx_eth you will see that the
"shared" driver still handles the mconf bus window configuration,
which is not abstracted yet.

Indeed, I've seen that. But I don't understand why it's done in the
mv643xx_eth_shared_probe(). The mbus window configuration registers are
per-network interface, so this call to mv643xx_eth_conf_mbus_windows()
could presumably be done in mv643xx_eth_probe().

At least in mvneta, we have the same registers, and we do their
initialization in the driver normal (and only) ->probe() routine.

Besides that, I would rather do it step by step.

Yes, agreed. But I think it would be good to have followed patches that
progressively get rid of the shared driver thing, as it will help in
bringing a proper DT binding in the mv643xx_eth driver. But it
certainly doesn't need to be part of this specific patch.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com