quoted
quoted
dcbt r0,r8,0b01010 /* GO */
.machine pop
Jimi, are you using an "old" binutils from before my patch that
changed the operand order for these types of instructions?
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-02/msg00044.html
=20
Actually, this confused me as well, that embedded has the same
instruction encoding but different mnemonic.
That it utterly horrid!
I was under the impression that the assembler made no instruction =
decisions based on CPU.
So your only hint would be that '0b' prefix.
Does AS even see that?
Or maybe see the 'r' prefix.
I know they tend to be absent making ppc asm even more unreadable.
It isn't as though the mnemonics were designed at a time when
the source file size or difference in decode time (or code space)
would be significant.
Otherwise it is a complete recipe for disaster.
David