On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 22:33 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
Hi Jimi,
quoted
I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
thingies be in "obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64)". The reason I ask is
that my compiler pukes on "dcbtst" and as I deal with that I wanted
to point this out.
I guess we could do that. It's a bit strange your assembler is
complaining about the dcbtst instructions since we wrap them with
power4:
.machine push
.machine "power4"
dcbt r0,r4,0b01000
dcbt r0,r7,0b01010
dcbtst r0,r9,0b01000
dcbtst r0,r10,0b01010
eieio
dcbt r0,r8,0b01010 /* GO */
.machine pop
Jimi, are you using an "old" binutils from before my patch that
changed the operand order for these types of instructions?
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-02/msg00044.html
Peter