RE: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: mpic timer driver
From: Wang Dongsheng-B40534 <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-01 08:19:22
-----Original Message----- From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:31 PM To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534 Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org; paulus@samba.org; Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: mpic timer driver =20 =20 On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:58 AM, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote: =20quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 9:14 PM To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534 Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org; paulus@samba.org; Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: mpic timer driver On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:20 AM, [off-list ref] [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Wang Dongsheng <redacted> Global timers A and B internal to the PIC. The two independent groups of global timer, group A and group B, are identical in theirfunctionality.quoted
The hardware timer generates an interrupt on every timer cycle. e.g Power management can use the hardware timer to wake up the machine. Signed-off-by: Wang Dongsheng <redacted> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <redacted>How much of this is FSL specific vs openpic? OpenPIC spec's timer support (only a single group).[Wang Dongsheng] Yes, OpenPIC only a single group timer. FSL: add more register, features and group. This patch only to support FSL chip. "mpic_timer.c" -> "fsl_mpic_timer.c" I will modify the description of the patch. how about?=20 I'd rather we support both, can we not use the MPIC_FSL flag to deal with FSL specific behavior? =20
[Wang Dongsheng] This patch, most of them are done processing cascade mode. Cascade is a FSL chip function. I think this patch is very targeted. I think that the patch only supports FSL chip.
- k =20