-----Original Message-----
From: Greg KH [mailto:<redacted>]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 9:32 PM
To: Singh Sandeep-B37400
Cc: Francois Romieu; <redacted>; linuxppc-
dev@lists.ozlabs.org; galak@kernel.crashing.org; linux-arm-
kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2/3][PATCH][v2] TDM Framework
=20
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:50:57AM +0000, Singh Sandeep-B37400 wrote:
quoted
1. You should send some kernel mode TDM clients. Without those the
framework
quoted
is pretty useless.
[Sandeep] We do have a test client but not good enough to be pushed in
open source, should we add it to documentation??
=20
Then how do you know if the framework is "correct" and good enough for
real clients? We don't add frameworks, or apis, to the kernel without
users, so you will have to come up with some users before we can accept
it.
We can only say that this framework is available in FSL BSPs and being used=
by VoIP companies.
But running a complete voice stack itself is beyond the scope of Freescale.
So vendors integrate their solutions with FSL solution.
To test the framework we have a small application in our BSP (this is a ver=
y basic test client) which tests the TDM driver and the SLIC interface from=
voice transfer perspective.
We can get this added in the Linux codebase in some test directory. What co=
uld be a good place for this?
Regards
Sandeep