On Jul 27, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 16:58 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
quoted
On Jul 20, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
=20
quoted
During suspend, all interrupts including IPI will be disabled. In =
this case,
quoted
quoted
the suspend process will hang in SMP. To prevent this, pass the flag
IRQF_NO_SUSPEND when requesting IPI irq.
=20
Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Li Yang <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
=20
BenH,
=20
Can you ack?
=20
No I'll merge it but not until it's been in next for a bit unless you
have some strong emergency there, it's on my mental list of things to
shovel into next after rc1.
I wasn't clear, I was meaning for my 'next' tree, not 3.6. Trying to =
get these FSL PM patches into my 'next' for 3.7.
- k
Curiosity: didn't we use to disable all non-boot CPUs on suspend ?
=20
Cheers,
Ben.
=20
quoted
- k
=20
quoted
=20
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index fecb038..d26bbf8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ int smp_request_message_ipi(int virq, int msg)
}
#endif
err =3D request_irq(virq, smp_ipi_action[msg],
- IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
+ IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD | =
IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
quoted
quoted
smp_ipi_name[msg], 0);
WARN(err < 0, "unable to request_irq %d for %s (rc %d)\n",
virq, smp_ipi_name[msg], err);
--=20
1.6.4.1
=20
=20