Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 7 authors, 2012-07-13

Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] powerpc/85xx: implement hardware timebase sync

From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-26 21:46:08
Also in: lkml

On 06/26/2012 09:03 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jun 26, 2012, at 5:25 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
quoted
Do hardware timebase sync. Firstly, stop all timebases, and transfer
the timebase value of the boot core to the other core. Finally,
start all timebases.

Only apply to dual-core chips, such as MPC8572, P2020, etc.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Li Yang <redacted>
---
Changes for v6:
* added 85xx_TB_SYNC
* added isync() after set_tb()
* removed extra entries from mpc85xx_smp_guts_ids
Why only on dual-core chips?  Is this because of something related to
2 cores, or related to corenet vs non-corenet SoCs and how turning
on/off the timebase works in the SOC?
Some parts are due to corenet versus non-corenet, such as the actual
register you write to to disable/enable the timebase.

There's also a two-core assumption in the synchronization code which
I've complained about multiple times -- although on closer inspection it
looks like this is done under cpu_add_remove_lock, and we can assume
that there's only one core at a time in take_timebase(), regardless of
how many cores are in the system.

-Scott
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help