On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:14:23PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [off-list ref] [2012-06-06 11:40:15]:
quoted
* Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:23:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 14:49 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
quoted
+int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, loff_t vaddr)
Don't we traditionally use unsigned long to pass vaddrs?
Right. But the vaddr we pass here is vma_info->vaddr which is loff_t.
I guess I should've made that clear in the patch description.
Why not fix struct vma_info's vaddr type?
Calculating and comparing vaddr results either uses variables of type loff_t.
To avoid typecasting and avoid overflow at each of these places, we used
loff_t.
Ananth, install_breakpoint() already has a variable of type addr of type
unsigned long. Why dont you use addr instead of vaddr.
Ok, makes sense. I'll change it in v2.
Ananth