Hi
I just found that the 'next' branch you mentioned have problem to boot up.
I test it in p1022ds and p1010rdb boards and the result are both the same.
Note that for p1022ds I use "make p1022ds.dtb" to make the dtb file(36bit) =
with 36bit-uboot.
And for p1010rdb I use all 32bit image.
The problem list below:
scsi0 : sata_fsl
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 74
fsl-sata fffe19000.sata: Sata FSL Platform/CSB Driver init
scsi1 : sata_fsl
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 41
Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000000
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0451630
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
SMP NR_CPUS=3D2 P1022 DS
Modules linked in:
NIP: c0451630 LR: c0451618 CTR: 00000007
REGS: ef03fce0 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (3.2.0-rc3-00099-g883381d)
MSR: 00029000 <EE,ME,CE> CR: 24042022 XER: 00000000
DEAR: 00000000, ESR: 00800000
TASK =3D ef040000[1] 'swapper' THREAD: ef03e000 CPU: 0
GPR00: ef03fd98 ef03fd90 ef040000 ef1ab22c 00000000 00000002 ffeb0000 0000f=
ffe
GPR08: b0541215 00000000 00000000 00000000 24042028 23c406c2 00000000 00000=
000
GPR16: c0000a00 00000014 3fffffff 03ff9000 00000015 7ff3a760 f1044030 fffff=
ff4
GPR24: c053e128 ef1ab230 c056a3a8 ef03e000 ef040000 ef1ab22c 00000000 ef1ab=
228
NIP [c0451630] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb4/0x190
LR [c0451618] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x9c/0x190
Call Trace:
[ef03fdd0] [c0451758] mutex_lock+0x4c/0x50
[ef03fde0] [c02b5124] mdiobus_read+0x38/0x74
[ef03fe00] [c02b41f4] get_phy_id+0x24/0x80
[ef03fe20] [c02b9de4] fsl_pq_mdio_probe+0x3b4/0x580
[ef03feb0] [c0266120] platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x30
[ef03fec0] [c0264bbc] driver_probe_device+0xa4/0x1d4
[ef03fee0] [c0264da8] __driver_attach+0xbc/0xc0
[ef03ff00] [c0263ac0] bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0x9c
[ef03ff30] [c02647f4] driver_attach+0x24/0x34
[ef03ff40] [c0264444] bus_add_driver+0x1ac/0x274
[ef03ff70] [c02651b0] driver_register+0x88/0x154
[ef03ff90] [c0266450] platform_driver_register+0x68/0x78
[ef03ffa0] [c05d93b8] fsl_pq_mdio_init+0x18/0x28
[ef03ffb0] [c0001eb8] do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a8
[ef03ffe0] [c05bb82c] kernel_init+0xa0/0x13c
[ef03fff0] [c000d878] kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68
Instruction dump:
801c0020 2f800063 419dffe8 3bbf0004 7fa3eb78 48001aad 813f000c 38010008
3b3f0008 901f000c 93210008 9121000c
3800ffff 93810010 7c0004ac
---[ end trace 1643a9a9c5097f8f ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
Call Trace:
[ef03fbc0] [c0008044] show_stack+0x44/0x154 (unreliable)
[ef03fc00] [c04532c8] panic+0xa4/0x1d8
[ef03fc50] [c0049a00] do_exit+0x5dc/0x684
[ef03fca0] [c000a6f0] die+0xdc/0x1b4
[ef03fcc0] [c00128d0] bad_page_fault+0xb4/0xfc
[ef03fcd0] [c000ebe4] handle_page_fault+0x7c/0x80
--- Exception: 300 at __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xb4/0x190
LR =3D __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x9c/0x190
[ef03fd90] [00000000] (null) (unreliable)
[ef03fdd0] [c0451758] mutex_lock+0x4c/0x50
[ef03fde0] [c02b5124] mdiobus_read+0x38/0x74
[ef03fe00] [c02b41f4] get_phy_id+0x24/0x80
[ef03fe20] [c02b9de4] fsl_pq_mdio_probe+0x3b4/0x580
[ef03feb0] [c0266120] platform_drv_probe+0x20/0x30
[ef03fec0] [c0264bbc] driver_probe_device+0xa4/0x1d4
[ef03fee0] [c0264da8] __driver_attach+0xbc/0xc0
[ef03ff00] [c0263ac0] bus_for_each_dev+0x60/0x9c
[ef03ff30] [c02647f4] driver_attach+0x24/0x34
[ef03ff40] [c0264444] bus_add_driver+0x1ac/0x274
[ef03ff70] [c02651b0] driver_register+0x88/0x154
[ef03ff90] [c0266450] platform_driver_register+0x68/0x78
[ef03ffa0] [c05d93b8] fsl_pq_mdio_init+0x18/0x28
[ef03ffb0] [c0001eb8] do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a8
[ef03ffe0] [c05bb82c] kernel_init+0xa0/0x13c
[ef03fff0] [c000d878] kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68
Rebooting in 180 seconds..
Do you or anyone else have any idea about this?
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]=20
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 3:10 PM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: Li Yang-R58472
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Unify pci/pcie initialization code
When you do this please do it against my latest upstream 'next' branch on:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git
- k
On Nov 24, 2011, at 12:27 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
Ok, I got it.
=20
- Hongtao
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Li Yang-R58472
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 2:06 PM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951; Kumar Gala
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] Unify pci/pcie initialization code
=20
Hongtao,
=20
Please update all the boards currently using fsl_add_bridge().
=20
- Leo
=20
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 12:51 PM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Gala Kumar-B11780; Li Yang-R58472
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Unify pci/pcie initialization code
=20
=20
On Nov 22, 2011, at 12:20 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
=20
quoted
Hi Kumar,
We want more comments on this series of patches ([1/2] & [2/2]) to=20
speed
up the pushing-to-kernel progress.
quoted
Thanks.
=20
I think the code is fine, but you need to update it for all the=20
boards include the 86xx ones.
=20
- k
=20
quoted
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 1:55 PM
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Li Yang-R58472; Gala Kumar-B11780; Jia Hongtao-B38951
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Unify pci/pcie initialization code
=20
In previous version pci/pcie initialization is in platform code=20
which
Initialize PCI bridge base on EP/RC or host/agent settings.
quoted
We unified pci/pcie initialization as common APIs named=20
fsl_pci_setup
which can be called by platform code.
quoted
=20
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Li Yang <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_ds.c | 30 ++-----------------
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 48
From: Tabi Timur-B04825 <hidden> Date: 2011-12-02 03:55:38
Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
Hi
I just found that the 'next' branch you mentioned have problem to boot up=
.
I test it in p1022ds and p1010rdb boards and the result are both the same=
.
Note that for p1022ds I use "make p1022ds.dtb" to make the dtb file(36bit=
) with 36bit-uboot.
And for p1010rdb I use all 32bit image.
The problem list below:
scsi0 : sata_fsl
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 74
fsl-sata fffe19000.sata: Sata FSL Platform/CSB Driver init
scsi1 : sata_fsl
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 41
Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000000
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0451630
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
Andy has phy driver patch that fixes this.
--=20
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale=
From: Kumar Gala <hidden> Date: 2011-12-02 04:12:50
On Dec 1, 2011, at 9:55 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
quoted
Hi
=20
I just found that the 'next' branch you mentioned have problem to =
boot up.
quoted
I test it in p1022ds and p1010rdb boards and the result are both the =
same.
quoted
Note that for p1022ds I use "make p1022ds.dtb" to make the dtb =
file(36bit) with 36bit-uboot.
quoted
And for p1010rdb I use all 32bit image.
The problem list below:
=20
scsi0 : sata_fsl
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 74
fsl-sata fffe19000.sata: Sata FSL Platform/CSB Driver init
scsi1 : sata_fsl
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 41
Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000000
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0451630
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
=20
Andy has phy driver patch that fixes this.
Andy,
What's going on here? Is there a fix in v3.2-rc4?
- k=
Yes, both v3.2-rc3 and v3.2-rc4 in Linus's tree have the same issue.
- Hongtao.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]=20
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 12:12 PM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: LinuxPPC-dev list; Li Yang-R58472
Subject: Re: [linuxppc-release] [powerpc] boot up problem
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:21 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
Hi
=20
I just found that the 'next' branch you mentioned have problem to boot up=
.
I test it in p1022ds and p1010rdb boards and the result are both the same=
.
Note that for p1022ds I use "make p1022ds.dtb" to make the dtb file(36bit=
) with 36bit-uboot.
And for p1010rdb I use all 32bit image.
The problem list below:
Is this the patch you mentioned?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/128806/
I applied this patch but the issue was still there.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tabi Timur-B04825=20
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:56 AM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-R58472; Fleming Andy=
-AFLEMING
Subject: Re: [linuxppc-release] [powerpc] boot up problem
Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
Hi
I just found that the 'next' branch you mentioned have problem to boot up=
.
I test it in p1022ds and p1010rdb boards and the result are both the same=
.
Note that for p1022ds I use "make p1022ds.dtb" to make the dtb file(36bit=
) with 36bit-uboot.
And for p1010rdb I use all 32bit image.
The problem list below:
scsi0 : sata_fsl
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 74
fsl-sata fffe19000.sata: Sata FSL Platform/CSB Driver init
scsi1 : sata_fsl
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 41
Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000000=20
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0451630
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
Andy has phy driver patch that fixes this.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
From: Kumar Gala <hidden> Date: 2011-12-07 14:53:27
This still needs a dts fix from Andy.
- k
On Dec 7, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
Is this the patch you mentioned?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/128806/
=20
I applied this patch but the issue was still there.
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Tabi Timur-B04825=20
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:56 AM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: Kumar Gala; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Li Yang-R58472; Fleming =
Andy-AFLEMING
Subject: Re: [linuxppc-release] [powerpc] boot up problem
=20
Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
quoted
Hi
=20
I just found that the 'next' branch you mentioned have problem to =
boot up.
quoted
I test it in p1022ds and p1010rdb boards and the result are both the =
same.
quoted
Note that for p1022ds I use "make p1022ds.dtb" to make the dtb =
file(36bit) with 36bit-uboot.
quoted
And for p1010rdb I use all 32bit image.
The problem list below:
=20
scsi0 : sata_fsl
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 74
fsl-sata fffe19000.sata: Sata FSL Platform/CSB Driver init
scsi1 : sata_fsl
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 irq 41
Fixed MDIO Bus: probed
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000000=20=
quoted
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0451630
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
=20
Andy has phy driver patch that fixes this.
=20
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
This is not the patch I am talking about. Unfortunately, I can't find the r=
ight patch in patchwork anywhere.
Andy, what about patch "fsl_pq_mdio: Clean up tbi address configuration"? =20=