Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: m25p80: Reworkprobing/JEDEC code
From: Mike Frysinger <hidden>
Date: 2010-06-21 16:55:19
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:47, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:34:05PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:20, Anton Vorontsov wrote:quoted
You can't easily change OF. It's like "let's change ACPI tables or BIOS in these PCs". Doable, but involves things like reflashing. And we usually have to support old BIOSes as well. OTOH, I see (git grep m25p arch/powerpc/boot/dts/) that in mainline kernel only MPC8569 board has a correct m25p node, and it is STMicro variant (it is JEDEC capable). As we don't really have to support out of tree code, I'd just go with this patch, assuming that we have to change device tree for boards with non-JEDEC flashes. It's effectively the same thing as platform data flag, except that it works automatically for OF platforms.diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80=
.c
quoted
quoted
index 81e49a9..a610ca9 100644--- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c@@ -680,6 +680,16 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] =3D =
{quoted
quoted
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0{ "m25p64", =C2=A0INFO(0x202017, =C2=A00, =
=C2=A064 * 1024, 128, 0) },
quoted
quoted
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0{ "m25p128", INFO(0x202018, =C2=A00, 256 * =
1024, =C2=A064, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 { "m25p05-nonjedec", =C2=A0INFO(0, 0, =C2=A032 =
* 1024, =C2=A0 2, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 { "m25p10-nonjedec", =C2=A0INFO(0, 0, =C2=A032 =
* 1024, =C2=A0 4, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 { "m25p20-nonjedec", =C2=A0INFO(0, 0, =C2=A064 =
* 1024, =C2=A0 4, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 { "m25p40-nonjedec", =C2=A0INFO(0, 0, =C2=A064 =
* 1024, =C2=A0 8, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 { "m25p80-nonjedec", =C2=A0INFO(0, 0, =C2=A064 =
* 1024, =C2=A016, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 { "m25p16-nonjedec", =C2=A0INFO(0, 0, =C2=A064 =
* 1024, =C2=A032, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 { "m25p32-nonjedec", =C2=A0INFO(0, 0, =C2=A064 =
* 1024, =C2=A064, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 { "m25p64-nonjedec", =C2=A0INFO(0, 0, =C2=A064 =
* 1024, 128, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 { "m25p128-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 256 * 1024, =
=C2=A064, 0) },
quoted
quoted
+are you picking the m25p because its flash geometry matches whatever you're using, or because you have some weird variant of the m25p that has JEDEC commands removed ?The latter. It's Numonyx M25Pxx flashes, see http://www.numonyx.com/Documents/Datasheets/M25P80.pdf =C2=A0 The RDID instruction is available only for parts made with 110 =C2=A0 nm Technology identified with Process letter '4'.
lovely. i guess this patch is the way to go to satisfy everyone's requirements. i'm also of the mindset that a mtd should not be created if the SPI flash isnt there simply because the resources say it might be. -mike