Thread (18 messages) flat view 18 messages, 4 authors, 2009-10-08

Re: [v7 PATCH 3/7]: x86: refactor x86 idle power management code and remove all instances of pm_idle.

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2009-10-07 14:43:09
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 21:01 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+++ linux.trees.git/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 #include <linux/pm.h>
 #include <linux/clockchips.h>
 #include <linux/random.h>
+#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
 #include <trace/events/power.h>
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/apic.h>
@@ -244,12 +245,6 @@ int sys_vfork(struct pt_regs *regs)
 unsigned long boot_option_idle_override = 0;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override);
 
-/*
- * Powermanagement idle function, if any..
- */
-void (*pm_idle)(void);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(pm_idle);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 /*
  * This halt magic was a workaround for ancient floppy DMA
@@ -329,17 +324,15 @@ static void do_nothing(void *unused)
 }
 
 /*
- * cpu_idle_wait - Used to ensure that all the CPUs discard old value of
- * pm_idle and update to new pm_idle value. Required while changing pm_idle
- * handler on SMP systems.
+ * cpu_idle_wait - Required while changing idle routine handler on SMP systems.
  *
- * Caller must have changed pm_idle to the new value before the call. Old
- * pm_idle value will not be used by any CPU after the return of this function.
+ * Caller must have changed idle routine to the new value before the call. Old
+ * value will not be used by any CPU after the return of this function.
  */
 void cpu_idle_wait(void)
 {
        smp_mb();
-       /* kick all the CPUs so that they exit out of pm_idle */
+       /* kick all the CPUs so that they exit out of idle loop */
        smp_call_function(do_nothing, NULL, 1);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait);
@@ -518,15 +511,59 @@ static void c1e_idle(void)
                default_idle();
 }
 
+static void (*local_idle)(void);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device, idle_devices);
+
+struct cpuidle_driver cpuidle_default_driver = {
+       .name =         "cpuidle_default",
+};
+
+static int local_idle_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_state *st)
+{
+       ktime_t t1, t2;
+       s64 diff;
+       int ret;
+
+       t1 = ktime_get();
+       local_idle();
+       t2 = ktime_get();
+
+       diff = ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(t2, t1));
+       if (diff > INT_MAX)
+               diff = INT_MAX;
+       ret = (int) diff;
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static int setup_cpuidle_simple(void)
+{
+       struct cpuidle_device *dev;
+       int cpu;
+
+       if (!cpuidle_curr_driver)
+               cpuidle_register_driver(&cpuidle_default_driver);
+
+       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+               dev = &per_cpu(idle_devices, cpu);
+               dev->cpu = cpu;
+               dev->states[0].enter = local_idle_loop;
+               dev->state_count = 1;
+               cpuidle_register_device(dev);
+       }
+       return 0;
+}
+device_initcall(setup_cpuidle_simple);
+
 void __cpuinit select_idle_routine(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-       if (pm_idle == poll_idle && smp_num_siblings > 1) {
+       if (local_idle == poll_idle && smp_num_siblings > 1) {
                printk(KERN_WARNING "WARNING: polling idle and HT enabled,"
                        " performance may degrade.\n");
        }
 #endif
-       if (pm_idle)
+       if (local_idle)
                return;
 
        if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) && mwait_usable(c)) {
@@ -534,18 +571,20 @@ void __cpuinit select_idle_routine(const
                 * One CPU supports mwait => All CPUs supports mwait
                 */
                printk(KERN_INFO "using mwait in idle threads.\n");
-               pm_idle = mwait_idle;
+               local_idle = mwait_idle;
        } else if (check_c1e_idle(c)) {
                printk(KERN_INFO "using C1E aware idle routine\n");
-               pm_idle = c1e_idle;
+               local_idle = c1e_idle;
        } else
-               pm_idle = default_idle;
+               local_idle = default_idle;
+
+       return;
 }
 
 void __init init_c1e_mask(void)
 {
        /* If we're using c1e_idle, we need to allocate c1e_mask. */
-       if (pm_idle == c1e_idle)
+       if (local_idle == c1e_idle)
                zalloc_cpumask_var(&c1e_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
 }
 
@@ -556,7 +595,7 @@ static int __init idle_setup(char *str)
 
        if (!strcmp(str, "poll")) {
                printk("using polling idle threads.\n");
-               pm_idle = poll_idle;
+               local_idle = poll_idle;
        } else if (!strcmp(str, "mwait"))
                force_mwait = 1;
        else if (!strcmp(str, "halt")) {
@@ -567,7 +606,7 @@ static int __init idle_setup(char *str)
                 * To continue to load the CPU idle driver, don't touch
                 * the boot_option_idle_override.
                 */
-               pm_idle = default_idle;
+               local_idle = default_idle;
                idle_halt = 1;
                return 0;
        } else if (!strcmp(str, "nomwait")) {

What guarantees that the cpuidle bits actually select this
cpuidle_default driver when you do idle=poll?

Also, cpuidle already has a poll loop in it, why duplicate that?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help