Thread (18 messages) flat view 18 messages, 4 authors, 2009-10-08

Re: [v7 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce cpuidle to POWER.

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2009-10-07 13:02:26
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 16:56 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] [2009-10-06 20:04:39]:
quoted
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 22:05 +0530, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
quoted
Also, the per-cpu nature of registration/unregistration of cpuidle
has been maintained as ACPI needs this.
Right, so can't we ditch that and have acpi default to the lowest
common
quoted
C-state and warn when various cpus report different C-states?
Hi Peter,

As Arjan mentioned previously, the per-cpu registration has to stay
for x86 for now due to legacy ACPI compatibility.  Breaking that may
break lot of existing users and we do not have a clean fallback
method.  
From what I understood some broken ass bioses report different C state
availability on different CPUs in the same SMP system.

I'm suggesting to work around that by limiting all CPUs to the subset of
C states reported on all CPUs, instead of the current mess.

I haven't heard anybody tell me why that wouldn't be possible on x86
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help