Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 3 authors, 2009-09-16

Re: [PATCH][v1] powerpc/85xx: Create dts for each core in CAMPmodefor P2020RDB

From: Gabriel Paubert <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-11 11:52:42

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 05:17:50PM +0530, Aggrwal Poonam-B10812 wrote:
 
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriel Paubert [mailto:paubert@iram.es] 
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 9:33 PM
To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v1] powerpc/85xx: Create dts for each 
core in CAMPmodefor P2020RDB

Ok, I wrongly understood protected interrupts as reserved for 
one core. However, I still dislike two devices having the same name.

Otherwise it may work if every interrupt is delivered to both 
cores although statistically only one core will actually have 
some work to do. Doesn't the kernel complain about unhandled 
irqs however? 
We don't see any such messages of unhandled interrupts, although I
checked the corresponding files for mpc8572ds, they do not have the
interrupts property for the serial ports at all, in both the core0 and
core1 dts.
Don't know the reason.
Well it may depend on the irqdebug (or actually it seems to 
be noirqdebug) kernel parameter.

But if serial is used for console, the message rate could
go ballistic.

	Gabriel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help