RE: [PATCH] Xilinx : Framebuffer Driver: Add PLB support (non-DCR)
From: John Linn <hidden>
Date: 2009-04-09 15:54:14
-----Original Message----- From: Dale Farnsworth [mailto:dale@farnsworth.org] =
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 9:36 AM To: John Linn; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xilinx : Framebuffer Driver: Add PLB =
support (non-DCR) =
quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:sfr@canb.auug.org.au] =
quoted
quoted
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 7:52 PM To: John Linn Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca; jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com; =
quoted
quoted
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; =
quoted
quoted
linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; =
quoted
quoted
akonovalov@ru.mvista.com; adaplas@gmail.com; Suneel =
Garapati; Suneelquoted
quoted
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xilinx : Framebuffer Driver: Add PLB =
quoted
quoted
support (non-DCR) =
quoted
quoted
Hi John, =
quoted
quoted
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:11:25 -0600 John Linn =
quoted
quoted
[off-list ref] wrote:quoted
* 2002-2007 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. * 2007 (c) Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd. + * 2009 (c) Xilinx Inc. * - * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU =
quoted
quoted
General Public Licensequoted
- * version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without =
quoted
quoted
any warranty of anyquoted
- * kind, whether express or implied. + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it + * and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; + * either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any + * later version. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public + * License along with this program; if not, write to the Free + * Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA + * 02139, USA.=
quoted
quoted
This changes the license for this file (from "GPLv2" to "GPLv2 or later"). Have you asked the other copyright owners about that?=
quoted
Andrei was copied on the patch, we'll see if he has any =
thoughts aboutquoted
it. =
=
Although I work for MontaVista, I don't speak for them on =
licensing issues. =
In my opinion, unless someone can come up with a compelling reason for changing the license terms of a file, they shouldn't be changed. MontaVista made a deliberate, considered decision to license that file under GPLv2 and not "GPLv2 or later". Those who use and distribute modifications to GPLv2 licensed work need to respect the license.
Thanks Dale, we agree, Grant said the same thing. I'll fix that when I respin the patch. -- John
=
-Dale =
=
This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named r= ecipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary= , privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intend= ed recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attac= hments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.