Re: [PATCH 0/6][RFC] kvmppc: paravirtualization interface

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:17:31AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:

The aim is not really fixed. It would be nice to get into 2.6.27, but 
since I can't yet expect how long it takes ...

Ahh okay, Id say given that we're 2/3rds through the merge window then
2.8.28 is a safer target.
 

Actually the guest patches would already go through reviews and 
upstream, due to the fact that the guest code changes are not that (the 
major part of the implementation will go over kvmppc -> kvm upstream).
But since I want to discuss about the standardization on the embedded 
hypervisor list first, the naming of the device tree entries are not 
fixed yet.

Okay.  When that's done we can take another look at them.

Therefor I can't yet define which kernel version merge window I'll 
target/reach.

btw - embedded hypervisor - I got advised that this is a closed list 
which I forgot.

... snipped from this reply

Yours Tony

  linux.conf.au    http://www.marchsouth.org/
  Jan 19 - 24 2009 The Australian Linux Technical Conference!