Re: [RFC] [PATCH] task_pt_regs for powerpc systems

On Monday 14 July 2008 11:06:47 pm Andreas Schwab wrote:

Timur Tabi [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Srinivasa D S wrote:

quoted

+#define task_pt_regs(tsk)	(tsk)->thread.regs

Shouldn't this be:

	#define task_pt_regs(tsk)	((tsk)->thread.regs)

just to be safe?

Both -> and . have already highest precedence as postfix operators.

Thanks for the comments, For safer side I have used "()"  and sent the updated 
patch.

Thanks
 Srinivasa DS