On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hmm... interesting points. I guess my feeling was that XILINX_DRIVERS could
be a more broadly configurable option, with some of these ideas in mind.
Currently, it's hidden by default, but we could easily change this to be
visible by default, or selected by a broader number of architectures. I
tend to think about them as a group: What if x86 *did* support the
primitives needed by these drivers, then if the individual drivers depend on
XILINX_DRIVERS, then the modification could be made in one spot. By your
suggestion, we would have to modify each one independantly.
Heh; it's not *that* many drivers and it's just Kconfig stuff which is
real easy to change. My preference would be to eliminate
XILINX_DRIVERS entirely, but I'm not going to fight about it. :-)
Cheers,
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.