Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] "NAND on UPM" and related patches
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2007-12-12 21:14:03
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2007-12-12 21:14:03
Scott Wood wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:quoted
As the compromise I might suggest this: forbid pattern_start/pattern_end from the ISRs (by marking them as might_sleep()), and replace _irqsave spinlock with simple spinlock.No, you cannot use a bare spinlock with IRQs enabled. You'll deadlock on SMP, and you'll have races with preemption enabled.
Sorry, brain fart... obviously, with preemption on it'd disable preemption even with a plain spinlock, and on SMP without preemption it's not an issue. Still, all you're getting rid of is the MSR twiddling, which should be pretty minor. -Scott