On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 12:06 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:32:25 -0800 Daniel Walker [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:04 -0800, Geoff Levand wrote:
quoted
Unfortunately there wasn't enough context in the patch to see
that there is a down() earlier in the routine, and that the patch
does indeed remove an incorrectly placed down(). Here is the
entire routine, marked with what the patch removes.
Andrew have you had a chance to review this?
Confused. I did review it: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/18/384
Yeah, but Geoff countered http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/18/409
Do you still think the patch is wrong, given the whole function?
Daniel