Re: use of fsl, in lite5200b.dts in git current

No one has answered this yet. It makes no sense at all to mix use of
the vendor prefix on some compatible entries and not on others. The
syntax of compatible entries needs to be consistent.

On 11/7/07, Jon Smirl [off-list ref] wrote:

On 11/7/07, Matt Sealey [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Jon Smirl wrote:

quoted

Sometimes the fsl prefix is being used and sometimes it isn't. Look at
the two compatible strings. Which way is it going to be? Is
fsl,has-wdt right?

fsl,has-wdt is right, at least since someone changed it.

What's the story with compatible?
I would think the gdt entries are wrong.

               gpt@600 {       // General Purpose Timer
                       compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-gpt","fsl,mpc5200-gpt";

code in drivers/watchdog/mpc5200_wdt.c would need to be changed to.

drivers/watchdog/mpc5200_wdt.c: { .compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-gpt", },

--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com

-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com