Re: use of fsl, in lite5200b.dts in git current

On 11/7/07, Matt Sealey [off-list ref] wrote:

Jon Smirl wrote:

quoted

Sometimes the fsl prefix is being used and sometimes it isn't. Look at
the two compatible strings. Which way is it going to be? Is
fsl,has-wdt right?

fsl,has-wdt is right, at least since someone changed it.

What's the story with compatible?
I would think the gdt entries are wrong.

               gpt@600 {       // General Purpose Timer
                       compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-gpt","fsl,mpc5200-gpt";

code in drivers/watchdog/mpc5200_wdt.c would need to be changed to.

drivers/watchdog/mpc5200_wdt.c: { .compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-gpt", },

-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com