Re: RFC: replace device_type with new "class" property?
From: David Gibson <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-30 23:02:41
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:06:33PM -0700, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Wood Scott-B07421 Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:34 AM To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 Cc: David Gibson; Olof Johansson; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: RFC: replace device_type with new "class" property? On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 09:23:14AM -0700, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:quoted
mpic: pic@40000 { clock-frequency = <0>; interrupt-controller; #address-cells = <0>; #interrupt-cells = <2>; reg = <40000 40000>; compatible = "fsl,xyz"; big-endian; } Note-- I removed the device_type property and changed compatible somewhat. How are you going to find where the meaning interrupt controller's interrupt cells are defined? What spec will you look at?The binding for fsl,xyz.Not every string listed in compatible has a spec backing it (or should be required to). You would have to go look at the source code and cross your fingers that the comments were sufficient.
But that's true in general. open-pic is practically the only time device_type will let you avoid that.
Another good reason for device_type-- it helps distinguish between two similar classes of devices. Both "open-pic" and "isa-pic" look very similar but have different encodings of their interrupt cells. Without a device_type it may be difficult or impossible to distinguish them unless the "name" and "compatible" are luckily clear enough.
This is a totally misleading argument. There may be one or two cases where the device_type is useful, but in most cases device_type will be either not specific enough to give you the information you need, or it we add lots of new device_type values, it will be so specific that it suffers the same problem as looking at name or compatible - you have to find the finding that goes with a particular device_type. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson