Re: RFC: replace device_type with new "class" property?
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-29 19:44:00
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-29 19:44:00
Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
Here's an example of what I'm trying to get at-- take
a node from a FSL device tree. The ideas I've heard
for expressing the class are like this--
#1 don't express any class at all:
ucc@2200 {
compatible = "fsl,ucc_geth";
model = "UCC";
device-id = <3>;
reg = <2200 200>;
interrupts = <22>;
interrupt-parent = < &qeic >;
mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ];
local-mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ];
rx-clock = <19>;
tx-clock = <1a>;
phy-handle = < &phy3 >;
pio-handle = < &pio3 >;
Of course, this should properly be something like
ethernet@2200 {
compatible = "fsl,mpc8360-qe-enet", "fsl,qe-enet";
local-mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ];
...
};
With no "mac-address", and a more useful "model" if any at all.
-Scott