Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Implement clockevents driver for powerpc

Sergei Shtylyov writes:

    I've just realized that I've missed the call to account_process_time() in 
the new timer_interrupt(). :-<

Which is bogus.  I had removed it in the version of the patch that I
posted in early September, but apparently it crept back in.

    Anyway, this leads to each tick being accounted twice if the deterministic 
accounting is not enabled -- first by timer_interrupt() and then by the 
hrtimers core, doesn't it?

Yep.

Actually, I thought I was told that with CFS, the total process time
was accounted accurately using sched_clock(), then apportioned between
utime and stime (using counts of ticks in user/system state, which are
somewhat inaccurate).  At the time I thought that would be OK, but now
I'm not so sure.

Paul.