RE: [PATCH] [UPDATED] tsec: Allow Ten Bit Interface to be configurable

-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:10 PM
To: joe.hamman@embeddedspecialties.com
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [UPDATED] tsec: Allow Ten Bit Interface to be
configurable


On Aug 13, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Joe Hamman wrote:

quoted

Allow the address of the Ten Bit Interface (TBI) to be changed in the
event of a conflict with another device.

Signed-off by: Joe Hamman [off-list ref]
---

Please ignore the last patch - I missed a cut & paste error on the
range
that my testing didn't catch.

I think we'd rather this came from the device tree.

Duh, that makes sense ;-)

Has there been any discussion yet?  Maybe something like this:

		mdio@24520 {
			#address-cells = <1>;
			#size-cells = <0>;
			device_type = "mdio";
			compatible = "gianfar";
			reg = <24520 20>;
			phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
				interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
				interrupts = <a 1>;
				reg = <0>;
				device_type = "ethernet-phy";
			};
			phy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
				interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
				interrupts = <a 1>;
				reg = <1>;
				device_type = "ethernet-phy";
			};
			phy2: ethernet-phy@2 {
				interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
				interrupts = <a 1>;
				reg = <2>;
				device_type = "ethernet-phy";
			};
			phy3: ethernet-phy@3 {
				interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
				interrupts = <a 1>;
				reg = <3>;
				device_type = "ethernet-phy";
			};
			tbi:  ethernet-tbi@1f {
				reg = <1f>;
				device_type = "ethernet-tbi";
			};
		};

Thanks,
Joe