quoted
What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the
opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during
arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to
port.
The point would be to keep the two trees separate, so that one doesn't
need to worry about breaking arch/ppc when making a change to
arch/powerpc.
We should make arch/ppc as broken as possible so no one can
complain when it is finally removed. I'll remove the config
from my auto-builder right now :-)
Segher