On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:44:31 -0500
Scott Wood [off-list ref] wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500
Kumar Gala [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back
into arch/ppc/kernel? or just include files?
What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the
opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during
arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to
port.
The point would be to keep the two trees separate, so that one doesn't
need to worry about breaking arch/ppc when making a change to arch/powerpc.
Who worries about that? ;).
Ok, I can see that. Still seems wasteful to me though.
josh