On Tue, 29 May 2007 21:41:25 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote:

I've been thinking about doing that too. In fact, some of the
ptrace-common.h stuff should probably be turned back into ptrace.c too
for the same reason. I'm still toying with that part of the designm but
yeah, I think that's something to do.

Yeah, I think having ptrace{,_32,_64}.c makes more sense as well.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/