Re: Fix problems with Holly's DT representation of ethernet PHYs
From: David Gibson <hidden>
Date: 2007-05-27 23:30:37
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 04:11:59PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
quoted
Waah! Third time lucky?You wish :-)quoted
- Second, the PHYs give only "bcm54xx" as a compatible property. This is unfortunate, because there are many bcm54xx PHY models, and they have differences which can matter. We add a more precise compatible string, giving the precise PHY model (bcm5461A in this case).You completely removed the "compatible" properties instead. Bad idea.
Um... weren't you the one that was just saying compatible properties aren't necessary if you can distinguish the hardware in other ways? -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson