From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Date: 2007-03-06 21:04:57
Is there any problem with the above approach? Is there any restriction
such that a cpu which acknowledged the interrupt only should send the eoi
signal?
While I don't think there -should- be any restriction, I also seem to
remember that the xics "emulation" done by the firmware on things like
JS20 requires the eoi to be done from the CPU where the interrupt
originated.
Ben.