Re: [PATCH 4/14] Use resource_size_t for serial port IO addresses
From: David Gibson <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-21 00:19:18
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:44:26PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello. David Gibson wrote:quoted
At present, various parts of the serial code use unsigned long to define resource addresses. This is a problem, because some 32-bit platforms have physical addresses larger than 32-bits, and have mmio serial uarts located above the 4GB point. This patch changes the type of mapbase in both struct uart_port and struct plat_serial8250_port to resource_size_t, which can be configured to be 64 bits on such platforms. The mapbase in serial_struct can't safely be changed, because that structure is user visible.Erm, isn't linux-serial@vger.kernel.org more proper list for such patches? Also, as serial drivers are now unmaintained, this probably needs to go to -mm tree.
I've also sent this to rmk, akpm and lkml for inclusion in -mm. It's just copied here so that all the patches necessary for Ebony are convenient in one place.
quoted
Index: working-2.6/drivers/serial/serial_core.c ===================================================================--- working-2.6.orig/drivers/serial/serial_core.c 2007-02-19 11:07:42.000000000 +1100 +++ working-2.6/drivers/serial/serial_core.c 2007-02-19 11:07:43.000000000 +1100@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ static int uart_get_info(struct uart_sta tmp.hub6 = port->hub6; tmp.io_type = port->iotype; tmp.iomem_reg_shift = port->regshift; - tmp.iomem_base = (void *)port->mapbase; + tmp.iomem_base = (void *)(unsigned long)port->mapbase;For 32-bit kernels this may result in a meaningless address. Have you considered also changing iomem_base's type?
Impossible; that's the serial_struct, which is userland visible. Yes, it will result in a meaningless address, but I don't see what else can be done. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson