On Feb 9, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
quoted
My feeling is to leave the code alone until we have the dma
mapping api setup to handle MURAM. If we can't do alloc/map/free
with the same mechanism I dont see the value in just doing 'map'.
It just makes the code more confusing w/o any big gain.
So you don't want to see a patch where we store the physical
address in our own data structures when the memory is mapped (or
allocated if it's regular RAM)?
It doesn't seem like it's that big of a change. I'd rather the code
clearly do different things for MURAM vs system memory for ALL accesses.
- k