On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 19:30 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
plain text document attachment (irq-comment.patch)
kernel/irq.c contains a comment that speaks of -1 and -2 as interrupt
numbers. Replace by NO_IRQ and NO_IRQ_IGNORE.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <redacted>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- mb-wireless.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c 2007-02-05 14:24:06.694526864 +0100
+++ mb-wireless/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c 2007-02-05 14:24:37.084526864 +0100
@@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
/*
* Every platform is required to implement ppc_md.get_irq.
- * This function will either return an irq number or -1 to
+ * This function will either return an irq number or NO_IRQ to
* indicate there are no more pending.
- * The value -2 is for buggy hardware and means that this IRQ
- * has already been handled. -- Tom
+ * The value NO_IRQ_IGNORE is for buggy hardware and means that this
+ * IRQ has already been handled. -- Tom
*/
irq = ppc_md.get_irq();
--
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev