On Tuesday 30 January 2007 16:31, Maynard Johnson wrote:

=20

quoted

On solution would be to move the notify_active flag from ctx->spu
into ctx itself, but maybe there are other ways to solve this.

In an earlier review of this patch, Christopher Hellwig suggested I move=

=20

the notify_active flag to be a bit in the sched_flags field that's added=

=20

in his scheduler patch series. =A0If this patch series will be a availabl=

e=20

in an "Arnd" tree that we'll be using for our current OProfile=20
development, perhaps I should wait until that time to change this, since=

=20

the window of vulnerability is quite small. =A0What do you think?

Sounds good to me.

	Arnd <><