On Dec 17, 2006, at 11:17 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:

Kim Phillips writes:

quoted

so the contents of 83xx/fsl.c would look like:
#ifdef CONFIG_MPC834x_SYS
define_machine(mpc834x_sys) {
	.name 		= "MPC834x SYS",
	.probe 		= mpc83xx_probe,
	.setup_arch 	= mpc83xx_setup_arch,
	.init_IRQ 	= mpc83xx_init_IRQ,
	.get_irq 	= ipic_get_irq,
	.restart 	= mpc83xx_restart,
	.time_init 	= mpc83xx_time_init,
	.calibrate_decr	= generic_calibrate_decr,
	.progress 	= udbg_progress,
};
#else

Why do you have this #else here?  Doesn't it just restrict you for no
gain?

I think you're looking at an old version of the patch.

quoted

#ifdef CONFIG_MPC834x_ITX
define_machine(mpc83xx) {
	.name 		= "MPC834x ITX",
<rest is the same>

Your probe function can set ppc_md.name to whatever it wants.  So you
could have a define_machine(fsl_83xx_eval_board) whose probe function
would pick up the actual board name from the device tree (e.g. the
root node's model property), put that in ppc_md and return 1 (assuming
of course that the device tree looks like one of your boards).

Paul.