Re: [RFC] Draft mpc52xx device tree specification
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2006-11-27 17:53:35
On 11/13/06, John Rigby [off-list ref] wrote:
I agree with Kim. I would like to see some kind of merge of this an booting-without-of.
okay, I understand the point, and I agree. However I've also received the comment that this document also needs to address boards with real OFW, and that booting_without_of.txt is kind of limited in that regard Perhaps it would be better to split off a 'device tree binding conventions' document; use booting_without_of.txt to describe the mechanism for non-OFW ports, and use another doc to describe layout expectation/conventions for common SoC's and devices. I'm about to post a patch set for the 52xx boards which includes this document. For the time being, I'm going to leave the document as is because I haven't had a chance to do any revision, but I'll take a look at shuffling stuff around once the 52xx patches are suitable for inclusion in .20 Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195