I agree with Kim.  I would like to see some kind of merge of this an
booting-without-of.

On 11/13/06, Kim Phillips [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:47:29 -0700
"Grant Likely" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This document specifies the requirements on the device-tree for mpc52xx
based boards.  These requirements are above and beyond the details
specified in the booting-without-of.txt document.

well, the definition of the compatible property has a different bias.  I'm
not saying the definition in booting-without-of is necessarily better (I
know the document is too linux- and freescale-specific in places), I'm just
saying that this document has good ideas, but is creating an unnecessary
diversion, and amending booting-without-of would help maintain consistency
with other platforms' efforts.

Kim
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev