Re: [PATCH 5/6] Have ia64 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <hidden>
Date: 2006-05-15 10:28:26
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, 15 May 2006 11:19:27 +0100 Andy Whitcroft [off-list ref] wrote:
Nick Piggin wrote:quoted
Andy Whitcroft wrote:quoted
Interesting. You are correct there was no config component, at the time I didn't have direct evidence that any architecture needed it, only that we had an unchecked requirement on zones, a requirement that had only recently arrived with the changes to free buddy detection. I note thatRecently arrived? Over a year ago with the no-buddy-bitmap patches, right? Just checking because I that's what I'm assuming broke it...Yep, sorry I forget I was out of the game for 6 months! And yes that was when the requirements were altered.
When no-bitmap-buddy patches was included,
1. bad_range() is not covered by CONFIG_VM_DEBUG. It always worked.
==
static int bad_range(struct zone *zone, struct page *page)
{
if (page_to_pfn(page) >= zone->zone_start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages)
return 1;
if (page_to_pfn(page) < zone->zone_start_pfn)
return 1;
==
And , this code
==
buddy = __page_find_buddy(page, page_idx, order);
if (bad_range(zone, buddy))
break;
==
checked whether buddy is in zone and guarantees it to have page struct.
But clean-up/speed-up codes vanished these checks. (I don't know when this occurs)
Sorry for misses these things.
-Kame