Re: Merging ppc32 and ppc64

On Aug 9, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:

Segher Boessenkool writes:

quoted

Yes, and that is exactly what I do not want.  We are not going
to require OF implementations that do not need yaboot or similar
to pass a flattened device tree to the kernel, eh?  Also, there
is no reason why something like yaboot (with an OF still running
underneath) should have to care about anything device-tree related
at all; the OS can just as easily ask the OF itself.

For now the kernel will cope with either having an OF client interface
entry point or a flattened device tree passed to it.  In the future we
intend to move all the OF client calls into the zImage wrapper and
have the zImage wrapper pass the flattened device tree to the kernel
proper.  That will be much cleaner because we will be able to get rid
of all of the dodgy RELOC stuff in prom_init.c.

Can you clarify when the "future" is.  I'd like to see this change  
happen as part of the arch/powerpc work.

- kumar