Re: Merging ppc32 and ppc64

On Aug 9, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 12:41:54PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:

quoted

On Aug 9, 2005, at 11:21 AM, Tom Rini wrote:

[snip]

quoted

quoted

That's not 100% true because as Segher said, prom_init.c is part of
the
kernel (tree, image), but is what does the translation.

I'm not sure I follow.  I understand that prom_init.c is part of the
kernel in ppc64.  I'm saying that such things should NOT be part of
the arch/powerpc kernel going forward.  They should be handled via
bootwrappers.

That's a "cleanup" we can argue about later, but I expect some
resistance :)

Why argue later?  Isn't part of the point of the merge to do cleanup  
between ppc32 & ppc64.  When would be the point to discuss this?

- kumar