Re: IRQS on 6 Slot Macs

User Benjamin Herrenschmidt says:

On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 14:35, Robert E Brose II wrote:

quoted

A couple of things right off, the rage128 appears to be the only thing on
irq 23 however 23 doesn't show up in /proc/interrupts meaning, I suppose,
that it's not using the interrupt. So why does the drm complain?

How come everything from slots 3-6 says it's on the same interrupt (25)?

I don't know what's up with the DRM not liking your interrupt. I can
answer for the sharing of USB, symbios and firewire interrupts: all 3
slots share one interrupt because of bad motherboard design :)
Basicallly, what they did when designing that machine was to use a
standard powersurge design with 3 slots and replace one of them
with a PCI<->PCI bridge. Since they didn't "know" how to get more
interrupt lines out of Grand Central, they just also stuffed all
interrupt lines together for those 4 slots (I'm pretty sure GC do
have spare lines they could have used, but that would have meant
updating Open Firmware to understand the layout, I doubt the people
who designed that machine wanted to dive into that).

Ben.

I suppose then that I should reorder the cards so that the ones generating
the most interrupts would be in the first 2 slots? It's pretty funny
having the possibility of the use of lots of irqs then ending up with
x86 style sharing. :(

Bob
--
/~\ The ASCII       | Robert E. Brose II    N0QBJ
\ / Ribbon Campaign | http://www.qbjnet.com/
 X  Help cure       | mailto:bob@qbjnet.com
/ \ HTML Email      | public key at http://www.qbjnet.com/key.html

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/