Re: Problems w/ CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MPC8xx_IDE

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:

Tom,

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

So which is the BK tree to use:
linuxppc_2_4_devel or linuxppc-2.4 ???

Aside from possible changes to match upstream subsystem rewrites (such
as IDE) there hasn't been any changes in linuxppc-2.4 specific to 8xx
that didn't happen in 2_4_devel.

quoted

http://www.penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml calls linuxppc_2_4_devel the
"old PPC development tree" !?

That's correct.  It's becoming more of a pain to maintain or own set of
trees to track 2.4 when Marcelo uses BK as well.

I suppose we need both trees. Otherwise you would have got rid of one.
Right? :o)

With an infinite amount of time, there would be only one tree.  Patches
to move things, one at a time, in logical chunks, to linux-2.4 happily
reviewed.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/