Re: Problems w/ CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MPC8xx_IDE

On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:

Tom,

quoted

quoted

I just noticed that I might have used the wrong source tree.

So which is the BK tree to use:

linuxppc_2_4_devel or linuxppc-2.4 ???

It depends on where what you want to use exists.  If something is in
_devel and not in linuxppc-2.4, patches to move features over one at a
time would be happily reviewed.

???
So which is the most recent?

Aside from possible changes to match upstream subsystem rewrites (such
as IDE) there hasn't been any changes in linuxppc-2.4 specific to 8xx
that didn't happen in 2_4_devel.

http://www.penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml calls linuxppc_2_4_devel the
"old PPC development tree" !?

That's correct.  It's becoming more of a pain to maintain or own set of
trees to track 2.4 when Marcelo uses BK as well.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/