Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 9 authors, 2003-02-20

Re: PowerMac vs. Intel for PowerPC Development Host

From: Chris Wedgwood <hidden>
Date: 2003-02-20 05:45:34

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:22:52PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
As an actual data point: my measurements show that a dual 1GHz G4
powermac is more than twice as fast at compiling PPC kernels as a
1.7GHz P4 (single cpu).
Wow... that's *much* better that I would have guessed.  Is the
compiler the same for each?
You can't fairly compare compiling a PPC kernel on a PPC box with
compiling an x86 kernel on an x86 box.  GCC does more work compiling
for PPC than for x86.
I wasn't trying to compare fairly, mostly get the lowest possible
compile time.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:10:48PM -0800, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
I tried to compile the _same_ PPC kernel for one of boards (440GP
based).
Cross compiling on PIII 755Mhz running SuSE        - 16 min
Cross compiling on G4 PowerBook 1Ghz running YDL   - 6 min
I don't have a PPC host to reasonably compare with, but a 440GP kernel
(linuxppc_2_4_devel) for me builds in 3 minutes 29s (with gcc-2.95).



   --cw

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help