Re: PowerMac vs. Intel for PowerPC Development Host
From: Eugene Surovegin <hidden>
Date: 2003-02-20 05:10:48
At 05:22 PM 2/19/2003, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Chris Wedgwood writes:quoted
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:52:58PM -0800, brian.auld@adic.com wrote:quoted
In the Intel vs. Mac debate for a linux development host for embedded ppc development, if money was not an issue, would I get more PowerMac recommendations??Despire what Apple and a few other people claim, Intel solutions are faster in terms of compile times, and if money was no barrier, then Intel solutions are potentially *much* faster.As an actual data point: my measurements show that a dual 1GHz G4 powermac is more than twice as fast at compiling PPC kernels as a 1.7GHz P4 (single cpu). You can't fairly compare compiling a PPC kernel on a PPC box with compiling an x86 kernel on an x86 box. GCC does more work compiling for PPC than for x86.
My 5 cents :) I tried to compile the _same_ PPC kernel for one of boards (440GP based). Cross compiling on PIII 755Mhz running SuSE - 16 min Cross compiling on G4 PowerBook 1Ghz running YDL - 6 min Eugene ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/