Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 9 authors, 2003-02-20

Re: PowerMac vs. Intel for PowerPC Development Host

From: Eugene Surovegin <hidden>
Date: 2003-02-20 05:10:48

At 05:22 PM 2/19/2003, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Chris Wedgwood writes:
quoted
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:52:58PM -0800, brian.auld@adic.com wrote:
quoted
In the Intel vs. Mac debate for a linux development host for
embedded ppc development, if money was not an issue, would I get
more PowerMac recommendations??
Despire what Apple and a few other people claim, Intel solutions are
faster in terms of compile times, and if money was no barrier, then
Intel solutions are potentially *much* faster.
As an actual data point: my measurements show that a dual 1GHz G4
powermac is more than twice as fast at compiling PPC kernels as a
1.7GHz P4 (single cpu).

You can't fairly compare compiling a PPC kernel on a PPC box with
compiling an x86 kernel on an x86 box.  GCC does more work compiling
for PPC than for x86.
My 5 cents :)

I tried to compile the _same_ PPC kernel for one of boards (440GP based).

Cross compiling on PIII 755Mhz running SuSE        - 16 min
Cross compiling on G4 PowerBook 1Ghz running YDL   - 6 min

Eugene


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help